This could easily happen to Jack.
Ξ September 20th, 2009 | → | ∇ Islam, MSM, demwits, duh, islamophuqnuts, jihadi fucks, loser, lying UN, lying media, mo, personal, politics, religion |
It is understood that they suggested that Mohammed, the founder of Islam, was a warlord and that traditional Muslim dress for women was a form of bondage.
Now it wouldn’t be because Jack is some Christian fanatic or a Christain at all. It would be because Jack knows that Islam IS not a mere religion but a political ideology to rule society wrapped in religion. That’s the real genious of it.
A warlord is a person with power who has both military and civil control over a subnational area due to armed forces loyal to the warlord and not to a central authority. The term can also mean one who espouses the ideal that war is necessary, and has the means and authority to engage in war.
Jack has no doubt Mohammad foots the bill as a “warlord”. If muslims take offense to that MUSLIMS need to revise THEIR own historical biography of Mohammad. Muslim documentation of Mohammads conquest is plain and simple. It goes like this. Invite them to Islam (peaceful part). If they refuse to allow the spread of Islam take them by force. That’s not Jack’s words but Muslim documentation.
Jack sees Mohammad more in the vien of Attila the Hun, Alexandra the Great etc … not a peace loving prophet.
And that’s why this could easily happen to Jack … but it won’t because he has never lost anything in the UK … and never will.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.