I’d chalk that up to a glitch if not for the fact that it jibes with Obama’s own notorious policy of not mentioning Islam in connection with jihadism. If that’s his rhetorical preference, okay; it reeks of embarrassing political correctness but it’s his prerogative to choose his own words. It’s not his prerogative to choose someone else’s words, particularly when that someone is a foreign head of state whose country is dealing with a more severe jihadist threat right now than the United States is. They’ve actually reached the point now where they’re blacking out references to Islam for English speakers in official state video of talks over terrorism. (At least they’re not censoring transcripts. Yet.)
KU students took to Twitter this week to express their outrage over the political speech, saying they are troubled that some of their classmates are Trump supporters, and even comparing the chalk messages to the confederate flag.
“The issue is folks in the KU vicinity support a racist, sexist demagogue.”
The university said that they would have allowed students to chalk had they applied for approval, but allegedly had staff remove the unapproved chalking the day it was discovered.
Former student senator Shegufta Huma, however, argued that approval from the University is less important than the message itself, tweeting a photo of one chalking with the caption, “Is this the post-racial paradise folks pretend exists?”
“The issue isn’t whether a student chalked or if it was approved,” Huma tweeted later. “The issue is folks in the KU vicinity support a racist, sexist demagogue.”
If this would be any republican that did this it would be front page above the fold in bold headlines news.
Wednesday on Newsmax TV’s “The Steve Malzberg Show,” veteran journalist Sharyl Attkisson said her sources have told her that President Barack Obama does not want and will not read intelligence reports on groups “he does not consider terrorists,” despite being on a U.S. list of designated terrorists.
Hey maybe that’s he is always saying … I only heard about that on the news! The smartest man in the room?
Mohammad’s goal was to create a worldwide caliphate.
Why wouldn’t ALL muslims support ISIS goal?
In a recent survey conducted by AlJazeera.net, the website for the Al Jazeera Arabic television channel, respondents overwhelmingly support the Islamic State terrorist group, with 81% voting “YES” on whether they approved of ISIS’s conquests in the region.
The poll, which asked in Arabic, “Do you support the organizing victories of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS)?” has generated over 38,000 responses thus far, with only 19% of respondents voting “NO” to supporting ISIS.
Now Mo said to do it peaceful if possible but if not peaceful by force. ISIS just skipped the peaceful part. Maybe that’s why Obama says ISIS is not Islam.
Again … Why wouldn’t ALL muslims support ISIS and more importantly Mohammad’s goal? The simple truth is that if they follow strict “Mohammad” teachings they do support ISIS goal.
No doubt everyone on the planet that has any access to media is aware of the Paris attacks. Many and Jack does mean MANY including many of the world leaders response has been … SHOCKED!
Jack is puzzled by the “I’m SHOCKED” part. What are they shocked about?
ISIS has a daily ongoing campaign to kill westerners (and muslims). They have been very clear about their goals and how they will meet those goals but our leaders and most on the left are SHOCKED when ISIS does exactly what they say they will do.
If a person tells you daily that they hate you and they want to kill you how many days will it take before you believe them? One day, week, month, year, 100 years … how long?
Jack can only come to few conclusions.
1. These are not very smart.
2. These people are terrible listeners (trait of a intelligent leader).
3. These people just don’t care.
4. They live in a bubble and cannot relate to the rest of the world.
What else could it be if people tell you every day they want to kill and then they do exactly that and your first response is … I’M SHOCKED. Jack is not shocked. He listens.
Obama said the Paris attacks were an “attempt” to cause terror. Jack would say the Paris attacks were very successful in causing terror. ISIS said this is the “start of the storm.” When another attack happens which is inevitable please don’t be shocked.
Let’s look at the part about … ISIS is NOT Islam?
The problem is ISLAM itself, not a “twisted” version of Islam. Leftist media and politicians live in a bubble of denial. ISIS IS ISLAM. I’m not saying it. Muslim surveys prove it. Honest Muslims admit it. Here’s proof, but “None is more blind than he who does not want to see.”
1. More than 81% of Al Jazeera readers approve of ISIS.
2. 9% of TOTAL U.K. population (not 9% of Muslims) have Favorable view of ISIS.
UK Muslim population estimated at 6-8%; (i.e. close to 100% of UK Muslims).
3. 16% of TOTAL French population (not 16% of Muslims) Favor ISIS.
Frances’ Muslim poulation is estimated at 15%. (i.e. close to 100% of French Muslims).
Don’t ask your country to do it for you. Step up to the plate and sponsor a family. Pay for their food, housing, schooling for their children. You get the idea. You want them. You pay for them. It’s easy peazy.
Now when the muslim that you sponsor throws that pulled pork sandwich in your face demands hala food and you pay for it … don’t bitch!
When that muslim family refuses to send their children to local schools that you payed for and demands mosque be built and you pay for those mosque to educate their children …. don’t bitch!
When these same muslims vote muslims into government and demand total change of your society … don’t bitch!
Jack really wanders who will be a taker of this deal? We know that NONE of the Gulf countries are willing to do this. Not ME governments or individuals in the ME are willing to do this.
Just food, housing, schooling etc etc for thought. Yes you will pay pay dearly with your life and your own society.
But most of all what do they want … MONEY?
Jack’s fav was the slow internet complaint. So if you sponsor a family be ready to provide a “nice” apartment, designer clothing, hala food, smokes … lots of smokes, blazing internet connections and MONEY for them to spend as THEY see fit.
I am writing this letter to bring to your attention something that I
and many Muslims believe is unfair and requires attention. I would like to inform you that the Oktoberfest is an Intolerant and Anti-Islamic event. We tried to ignore the event, but there too many Un-Islamic acts done at the Oktoberfest. Such as alcohol consumption, public nudity etc.
We understand that the Oktoberfest is a yearly German tradition, but we, Muslims, can not tolerate this Un-Islamic event, because it offends us and all Muslims on the earth. We are requesting the immediate cancellation of the upcoming Oktoberfest event.
We also believe that the Oktoberfest might also offend all the Muslim refugees coming from Syria, Iraq,
Afghanistan. The cancellation of the Oktoberfest event will help refugees not to forget their Islamic history. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
He forgot to mention all the pork sausage they eat too!
This is what the City council of Munich should write back.
Thank you for your concern … Oktoberfest has been part of German culture for 100’s of years long before muslims were here and we love our beer, pork sausage and yes blondes with big TITS … NO!
Maybe the muslim community should hold their own festival that has Islamic values. You could have a public stoning, cut thieves hands off and let’s not forget the gay toss off a tall building. Only problem is you’ll have to travel to a muslim country to hold these Islamic value activities.
Obama is almost waging war on “violent extremism” …aka ISIS. Jack prefers to call them simply what they call themselves IS (Islamic State). Now IS is killing non- muslims and muslims alike for the crime of blasphemy and other crimes per sharia law. Obama says IS is not islamic and has nothing to do with Islam. Jack says Obama needs to read the Koran, hadith and sunna. Why?
Riyadh: An Islamic court in Saudi Arabia has sentenced a man to death for renouncing his Muslim faith, local media reported on Tuesday.
The man, in his 20s, posted an online video ripping up a copy of the Quran and hitting it with a shoe, the media reported.
Saudi Arabia follows the strict school of Islam and gives the clergy control over its justice system.
Under its interpretation of Sharia, apostasy demands the death penalty, as do some other religious offences like sorcery, while blasphemy and criticism of senior Muslim clerics have incurred jail terms and corporal punishment.
Executions in Saudi Arabia are usually carried out by public beheading.
Now who would you think knows more about “sharia law”, Obama or Saudi Arabian government? Who do you think has read, reread, studied and interpreted the true meaning of Koran, hadith and sunna? Obama or Saudi Arabian government? It’s not just Obama though. It’s John Kerry and virtually every single person working for Obama.
Come on Obama … stop the tweeting and twirking … pick up a book.
Yazidi women and children [are to be] divided according to the Shariah amongst the fighters of the Islamic State who participated in the Sinjar operations [in northern Iraq] … Enslaving the families of the kuffar [infidels] and taking their women as concubines is a firmly established aspect of the Shariah that if one were to deny or mock, he would be denying or mocking the verses of the Koran and the narrations of the Prophet … and thereby apostatizing from Islam.
This is why Obama and others can’t call IS Islamic. Thing is if they can’t call IS Islamic they can’t call Koran, hadith and sunna Islamic. Both are one in the same.
Much of the pamphlet talks about ISIS’ policy on having sexual intercourse with a female slave, something that the group cites the Quran to justify.
This document marks the most detailed, albeit not first, justification for enslaving nonbelievers, as defined by ISIS. Time and again, the group cites the Quran and its view of Sharia law.
This CNN reporter and the others in this article have not read the Quran, haddith and sunna. If they had they would know that the answers to those questions would be … YES, says the Quran, hadith and sunna … not yes , says ISIS.
So the real headline for this article should be … Quran: Enslaving having sex with unbelieving women girls is OK because that’s exactly what Quran says about muslim captive women.
We all remember when the term “postal” came into play when disgruntled postal employee years ago murdered coworkers. Marc Lamont Hill, Obama administration, Eric Holder/DOJ and all the lefties can’t say it. They won’t say it until Obama says it and that ain’t going to happen on his watch.
This is the part that really caught jacks attention …
Now … “All sorts of reasons”?
Do tell. Name ONE in the last year that does not involve Islam.
And you won’t hear it on ABC, NBC, CBS, NPR or any other national media that may reach the masses.
… nothing to do with Islam? Straight from that holy book Quran.
Sura 47:4: “When you meet the unbelievers, smite their necks.” For centuries, Furnish observes, “leading Islamic scholars have interpreted this verse literally,” and examples abound throughout Islamic history.
Islam did exactly as Quran commands to the neck of another unbeliever today. He was French but the main thing here is that he was an “unbeliever.”
This IS the “religion” Obama and almost all our world leaders defends.
That’s kinda true or half truth. If you are muslim that may be true per the Quran. If you are any other religion it may not be true per the Quran. What most would call “innocents” the Quran and Mohammad disagreed in many cases and killed what most would call innocents. Did Mohammad himself get Islam wrong? Obama knows this but INSIST “IS” is not Islamic … blah blah blah in his speech last night. Infact Obama being an apostate of Islam per his claims of being Christian he is NOT innocent and he should be put to death per Sharia/Islamic law.
It’s complicated but Obama is a simpleton on this. Simply not telling the truth again. Fact is Islam does condone killing depending on Islams definition of “innocent.” That kinda leaves it wide open. So what’s new in his speech last night … nuttin!
“I’m not sure we can publish this book without the Right using it to their ends,” Sarah Durand, a senior editor at Atria Books, a division of Simon & Schuster, wrote in an email to one of the soldiers’ agents.
Jack thinks they are crazy for not publishing this book but they (Simon & Schuster) have a larger calling you see, to protect our dear president.
Fine. Someone WILL publish this book and it will sell. It will give eyewitness accounts not make believe that Simon & Schuster would demand probably at the request of our dear most transparent president.