Obama is almost waging war on “violent extremism” …aka ISIS. Jack prefers to call them simply what they call themselves IS (Islamic State). Now IS is killing non- muslims and muslims alike for the crime of blasphemy and other crimes per sharia law. Obama says IS is not islamic and has nothing to do with Islam. Jack says Obama needs to read the Koran, hadith and sunna. Why?
Saudi court gives death penalty to man who renounced his Muslim faith
Riyadh: An Islamic court in Saudi Arabia has sentenced a man to death for renouncing his Muslim faith, local media reported on Tuesday.
The man, in his 20s, posted an online video ripping up a copy of the Quran and hitting it with a shoe, the media reported.
Saudi Arabia follows the strict school of Islam and gives the clergy control over its justice system.
Under its interpretation of Sharia, apostasy demands the death penalty, as do some other religious offences like sorcery, while blasphemy and criticism of senior Muslim clerics have incurred jail terms and corporal punishment.
Executions in Saudi Arabia are usually carried out by public beheading.
Now who would you think knows more about “sharia law”, Obama or Saudi Arabian government? Who do you think has read, reread, studied and interpreted the true meaning of Koran, hadith and sunna? Obama or Saudi Arabian government? It’s not just Obama though. It’s John Kerry and virtually every single person working for Obama.
Come on Obama … stop the tweeting and twirking … pick up a book.
Rudy had the balls to call Obama out.
Jack thinks that Obama does love. He loves the America he can create. He hates the America we have. This has been well documented. Hope and Change … you got to love it. If not Obama has attacked with the full force of (IRS, DOJ, EPA … etc) and any other tool he can use of the American government that he hates and wants to change.
But most of all Obama loves himself.
And how has Obama done this? Well … the democratic party and democratic voters say go ahead. We don’t care what the courts and other checks on your power are … do it!
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 26% of Likely U.S. Voters think the president should have the right to ignore federal court rulings if they are standing in the way of actions he feels are important for the country…
But perhaps more unsettling to supporters of constitutional checks and balances is the finding that 43% of Democrats believe the president should have the right to ignore the courts. Only 35% of voters in President Obama’s party disagree, compared to 81% of Republicans and 67% of voters not affiliated with either major party…
[W]hile 72% of GOP voters and 63% of unaffiliateds believe it is more important to preserve our constitutional system of checks and balances than for the federal government to operate efficiently, Democrats are evenly divided…
Women and younger voters feel more strongly than men and those 40 and older that the president should have the right to ignore federal court rulings. Black voters believe that more than whites and other minority voters do.
Last but most important you have the fluffer’s. Come on you educated liberals know the fluffer’s job? The movie couldn’t be made with out them. You will never see them above the fold. Only on page F7 of the paper to be able to say, HEY we covered that in case someone with balls like Rudy calls them out!
Exactly what the Koran commands for muslims to do.
Yazidi women and children [are to be] divided according to the Shariah amongst the fighters of the Islamic State who participated in the Sinjar operations [in northern Iraq] … Enslaving the families of the kuffar [infidels] and taking their women as concubines is a firmly established aspect of the Shariah that if one were to deny or mock, he would be denying or mocking the verses of the Koran and the narrations of the Prophet … and thereby apostatizing from Islam.
This is why Obama and others can’t call IS Islamic. Thing is if they can’t call IS Islamic they can’t call Koran, hadith and sunna Islamic. Both are one in the same.
… as much about the media in general. Brian Williams is just the spark that has ignited the disdain for the MSM! MSM is sick. Sick dogs that don’t report the news anymore. They distort, exaggerate, ignore and yes when all else fails just flat out lies.
Kinda like the man in the White House.
In 2004, he said: “What I believe, in my faith, is that a man and a woman, when they get married, are performing something before God, and it’s not simply the two persons who are meeting.” He repeated that claim during the 2008 presidential campaign and beyond, citing his understanding of “traditional definitions of marriage.” Those assurances came after Obama had initially backed gay marriage in 1996.
“Obama Misled Nation” is almost a perennial headline–it applies to nearly everything the president does. Yet it is important to be clear about the nature of this particular lie.
Obama did not just pretend not to hold a controversial position. He pretended to hold that view as a matter of his Christian faith. He lied about his most sincere religious convictions–and much of his senior staff lied along with him.
When Obama lies he just “misled.” No he lied and so does our MSM. They do it all the time and with little to no repercussions. So they keep on lying … why not!
… refusing to do his job!
“This is shaping up to be a titanic struggle behind the scenes,” he said. “Believe me, the Army here wants to do the right thing … And the White House, because of the political narrative, President Obama cozying up to the parents and because he, President Obama, releasing the five Taliban … The narrative is what the White House does not want to have come out.”
This is dereliction of duty by our commander-in-chief to save his political ass. PFC Bowe Bergdahl and Obama do have something in common … BOTH refuse to do the job they signed on for.
… because Obama just can’t be bothered.
‘It is incomprehensible that you can turn against freedom,’ Mayor Aboutaleb told Dutch current affairs program Nieuwsuur (Newshour).
‘But if you don’t like freedom, for heaven’s sake pack your bags and leave.
‘If you do not like it here because some humorists you don’t like are making a newspaper, may I then say you can f*** off.
That doesn’t really sound radical to jack. But if you think it does sound radical … you can f*** off too.
Can you take non-Muslim women and children captive? Yes, says ISIS.
Much of the pamphlet talks about ISIS’ policy on having sexual intercourse with a female slave, something that the group cites the Quran to justify.
This document marks the most detailed, albeit not first, justification for enslaving nonbelievers, as defined by ISIS. Time and again, the group cites the Quran and its view of Sharia law.
This CNN reporter and the others in this article have not read the Quran, haddith and sunna. If they had they would know that the answers to those questions would be … YES, says the Quran, hadith and sunna … not yes , says ISIS.
So the real headline for this article should be … Quran: Enslaving having sex with unbelieving women girls is OK because that’s exactly what Quran says about muslim captive women.
… also a DC congresswoman. She readily admits she doesn’t know the facts and demands the facts don’t matter … only her agenda. Most liberals would agree with her too!
Majority of MSM agrees with her also.
The context of the emails is concern about news reports that put Eric Holder at the center of the Fast and Furious scandal. In the first email, at 7:46, Schmaler says that there were no Fast and Furious stories from the NY Times, the Associated Press, Reuters, the Washington Post, NBC or Bloomberg.
But there is one person out of step: Sharyl Attkisson. Schmaler writes:
I’m also calling Sharryl’s editor and reaching out to Schieffer. She’s out of control.
Which is highly revealing: the Obama administration expects reporters to be under control. As, of course, they generally are, like the Times, the Post, AP, etc.
Schultz replies: Good. Her piece was really bad for AG.
We can’t have that. We need to get the one reporter willing to dig into the story under control.
But Schultz can’t seem to believe the White House’s good fortune:
Why do you think no one else wrote? Were they not fed the documents?
Apparently the others are all loyal Democrats.
You can see it’s not the media that won’t cover scandals it’s the only one that will cover scandals that is “out of control” … and the most transparent Obama administration ever can’t have that bitch out of control.
Get her book and read it … Stonewalled and make up your own mind who is “out of control!”
… check out # 59 and # 65
59. Council on American-Islamic Relations (Cair)
65. Muslim American Society (Mas)
Two prominent muslim groups that President Obama loves.
No this is not a blond joke. If you watch the vid Andrea Mitchell gives Wendy Davis multiple chances to save herself but Wendy sticks to her talking points. Andrea even suggest Greg Abbott may have been faking his … disability.
Greg Abbott has been in a wheel chair since 1984 and now the Dems are questioning his disability?
That’s smell you smell is defeat for Wendy Davis. At best these gals owe Greg Abbott an apology and maybe even a blow job. Then they would know for sure if he has a disability!
… defend something you have never read or really know anything about.
Ben’s total ignorance of the Quran, hadith and sunna shines through. Notice he goes straight to the gross, racist meme. The other panelist are just as dumb about the subject.
We all remember when the term “postal” came into play when disgruntled postal employee years ago murdered coworkers. Marc Lamont Hill, Obama administration, Eric Holder/DOJ and all the lefties can’t say it. They won’t say it until Obama says it and that ain’t going to happen on his watch.
This is the part that really caught jacks attention …
Now … “All sorts of reasons”?
Do tell. Name ONE in the last year that does not involve Islam.
And you won’t hear it on ABC, NBC, CBS, NPR or any other national media that may reach the masses.
… nothing to do with Islam? Straight from that holy book Quran.
Sura 47:4: “When you meet the unbelievers, smite their necks.” For centuries, Furnish observes, “leading Islamic scholars have interpreted this verse literally,” and examples abound throughout Islamic history.
Islam did exactly as Quran commands to the neck of another unbeliever today. He was French but the main thing here is that he was an “unbeliever.”
This IS the “religion” Obama and almost all our world leaders defends.
… say muslims. Here’s a thought. Get a friging job and buy your own food … if you can’t eat this shit!
… sexual violence?
In his Sept. 10 speech laying out his plan for fighting IS, President Obama devoted just eight words to the issue: “They enslave, rape, and force women into marriage.”
Well that’s a start but only half the story. “They enslave, rape, and force women into marriage.” Now if only Obama could have added … This is “Islamic war doctrine per Quran, hadith, sunna” he would have been totally honest. Obama would not and could not say that. No western politician can say that. It would set the world on fire!
Jack is not a politician so he can say it. He’ll say it in a way most everyone will understand.
If it was good enough for Mohammad it is good enough for IS! Now IS has really put the muslim world in a tight spot because they know this and they don’t know what to do. Muslims KNOW that once an Islamic Caliphate is established and the Caliphate declares war which IS has done it is perfectly acceptable per Quran, hadith ,sunna to … “enslave, rape, and force women into marriage.”
Talking to many muslims in the past they have always told Jack that the verses of the Quran that “condone” this was ONLY when a caliphate was rule of law. Well hello IS.
Now what was that about IS is not being Islamic?
… innocents like the IRS follows the law?
That’s kinda true or half truth. If you are muslim that may be true per the Quran. If you are any other religion it may not be true per the Quran. What most would call “innocents” the Quran and Mohammad disagreed in many cases and killed what most would call innocents. Did Mohammad himself get Islam wrong? Obama knows this but INSIST “IS” is not Islamic … blah blah blah in his speech last night. Infact Obama being an apostate of Islam per his claims of being Christian he is NOT innocent and he should be put to death per Sharia/Islamic law.
It’s complicated but Obama is a simpleton on this. Simply not telling the truth again. Fact is Islam does condone killing depending on Islams definition of “innocent.” That kinda leaves it wide open. So what’s new in his speech last night … nuttin!
Look at it like this. We follow the law when we can and when we can’t all bets are off.
Jack thinks it’s much more than 15%.
Up to 15 percent of French people said they have a positive attitude toward the Islamic State, formerly known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The share of ISIS supporters is largest among France’s younger generation, a new poll says.
Twice as many French people expressed a positive reaction to Islamic State (IS) militants than in Britain, where the number of people favorably disposed to the IS stands at 7 percent, and Germany, where a meager 2 percent of the respondents sided with the IS, according to a poll carried out in July among 1,000 people aged over 15 years (over 18 in Britain) in each country. The poll was conducted by ICM Research for the Russian news agency Rossiya Segodnya.
What is religious extremism but this aim to apply Shariah as state law? This is exactly what ISIS (Islamic State) is attempting do with its caliphate. Unless we challenge this un-Islamic, impractical and flawed concept of trying to govern by a rigid interpretation of Shariah, no amount of work by a United Nations agency can unravel Islamist terrorism.
For those that do not know. The bolded part above (What is religious extremism but this aim to apply Shariah as state law?) is EXACTLY what Mohammad demanded per the Quran not only in ME but the world.
Jack is wondering what Quran this man has been reading? Must be a different one that jack has read many times. This man wants to put it on the Saudis and not the real culprit … Islam.
Next Page »
“I’m not sure we can publish this book without the Right using it to their ends,” Sarah Durand, a senior editor at Atria Books, a division of Simon & Schuster, wrote in an email to one of the soldiers’ agents.
“The Conservatives are all over Bergdahl and using it against Obama,” Durand wrote,
Jack thinks they are crazy for not publishing this book but they (Simon & Schuster) have a larger calling you see, to protect our dear president.
Fine. Someone WILL publish this book and it will sell. It will give eyewitness accounts not make believe that Simon & Schuster would demand probably at the request of our dear most transparent president.