Obama is almost waging war on “violent extremism” …aka ISIS. Jack prefers to call them simply what they call themselves IS (Islamic State). Now IS is killing non- muslims and muslims alike for the crime of blasphemy and other crimes per sharia law. Obama says IS is not islamic and has nothing to do with Islam. Jack says Obama needs to read the Koran, hadith and sunna. Why?
Riyadh: An Islamic court in Saudi Arabia has sentenced a man to death for renouncing his Muslim faith, local media reported on Tuesday.
The man, in his 20s, posted an online video ripping up a copy of the Quran and hitting it with a shoe, the media reported.
Saudi Arabia follows the strict school of Islam and gives the clergy control over its justice system.
Under its interpretation of Sharia, apostasy demands the death penalty, as do some other religious offences like sorcery, while blasphemy and criticism of senior Muslim clerics have incurred jail terms and corporal punishment.
Executions in Saudi Arabia are usually carried out by public beheading.
Now who would you think knows more about “sharia law”, Obama or Saudi Arabian government? Who do you think has read, reread, studied and interpreted the true meaning of Koran, hadith and sunna? Obama or Saudi Arabian government? It’s not just Obama though. It’s John Kerry and virtually every single person working for Obama.
Come on Obama … stop the tweeting and twirking … pick up a book.
Yazidi women and children [are to be] divided according to the Shariah amongst the fighters of the Islamic State who participated in the Sinjar operations [in northern Iraq] … Enslaving the families of the kuffar [infidels] and taking their women as concubines is a firmly established aspect of the Shariah that if one were to deny or mock, he would be denying or mocking the verses of the Koran and the narrations of the Prophet … and thereby apostatizing from Islam.
This is why Obama and others can’t call IS Islamic. Thing is if they can’t call IS Islamic they can’t call Koran, hadith and sunna Islamic. Both are one in the same.
‘It is incomprehensible that you can turn against freedom,’ Mayor Aboutaleb told Dutch current affairs program Nieuwsuur (Newshour).
‘But if you don’t like freedom, for heaven’s sake pack your bags and leave.
‘If you do not like it here because some humorists you don’t like are making a newspaper, may I then say you can f*** off.
That doesn’t really sound radical to jack. But if you think it does sound radical … you can f*** off too.
Much of the pamphlet talks about ISIS’ policy on having sexual intercourse with a female slave, something that the group cites the Quran to justify.
This document marks the most detailed, albeit not first, justification for enslaving nonbelievers, as defined by ISIS. Time and again, the group cites the Quran and its view of Sharia law.
This CNN reporter and the others in this article have not read the Quran, haddith and sunna. If they had they would know that the answers to those questions would be … YES, says the Quran, hadith and sunna … not yes , says ISIS.
So the real headline for this article should be … Quran: Enslaving having sex with unbelieving women girls is OK because that’s exactly what Quran says about muslim captive women.
We all remember when the term “postal” came into play when disgruntled postal employee years ago murdered coworkers. Marc Lamont Hill, Obama administration, Eric Holder/DOJ and all the lefties can’t say it. They won’t say it until Obama says it and that ain’t going to happen on his watch.
This is the part that really caught jacks attention …
Now … “All sorts of reasons”?
Do tell. Name ONE in the last year that does not involve Islam.
And you won’t hear it on ABC, NBC, CBS, NPR or any other national media that may reach the masses.
… nothing to do with Islam? Straight from that holy book Quran.
Sura 47:4: “When you meet the unbelievers, smite their necks.” For centuries, Furnish observes, “leading Islamic scholars have interpreted this verse literally,” and examples abound throughout Islamic history.
Islam did exactly as Quran commands to the neck of another unbeliever today. He was French but the main thing here is that he was an “unbeliever.”
This IS the “religion” Obama and almost all our world leaders defends.
In his Sept. 10 speech laying out his plan for fighting IS, President Obama devoted just eight words to the issue: “They enslave, rape, and force women into marriage.”
Well that’s a start but only half the story. “They enslave, rape, and force women into marriage.” Now if only Obama could have added … This is “Islamic war doctrine per Quran, hadith, sunna” he would have been totally honest. Obama would not and could not say that. No western politician can say that. It would set the world on fire!
Jack is not a politician so he can say it. He’ll say it in a way most everyone will understand.
If it was good enough for Mohammad it is good enough for IS! Now IS has really put the muslim world in a tight spot because they know this and they don’t know what to do. Muslims KNOW that once an Islamic Caliphate is established and the Caliphate declares war which IS has done it is perfectly acceptable per Quran, hadith ,sunna to … “enslave, rape, and force women into marriage.”
Talking to many muslims in the past they have always told Jack that the verses of the Quran that “condone” this was ONLY when a caliphate was rule of law. Well hello IS.
That’s kinda true or half truth. If you are muslim that may be true per the Quran. If you are any other religion it may not be true per the Quran. What most would call “innocents” the Quran and Mohammad disagreed in many cases and killed what most would call innocents. Did Mohammad himself get Islam wrong? Obama knows this but INSIST “IS” is not Islamic … blah blah blah in his speech last night. Infact Obama being an apostate of Islam per his claims of being Christian he is NOT innocent and he should be put to death per Sharia/Islamic law.
It’s complicated but Obama is a simpleton on this. Simply not telling the truth again. Fact is Islam does condone killing depending on Islams definition of “innocent.” That kinda leaves it wide open. So what’s new in his speech last night … nuttin!
Up to 15 percent of French people said they have a positive attitude toward the Islamic State, formerly known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The share of ISIS supporters is largest among France’s younger generation, a new poll says.
Twice as many French people expressed a positive reaction to Islamic State (IS) militants than in Britain, where the number of people favorably disposed to the IS stands at 7 percent, and Germany, where a meager 2 percent of the respondents sided with the IS, according to a poll carried out in July among 1,000 people aged over 15 years (over 18 in Britain) in each country. The poll was conducted by ICM Research for the Russian news agency Rossiya Segodnya.
What is religious extremism but this aim to apply Shariah as state law? This is exactly what ISIS (Islamic State) is attempting do with its caliphate. Unless we challenge this un-Islamic, impractical and flawed concept of trying to govern by a rigid interpretation of Shariah, no amount of work by a United Nations agency can unravel Islamist terrorism.
For those that do not know. The bolded part above (What is religious extremism but this aim to apply Shariah as state law?) is EXACTLY what Mohammad demanded per the Quran not only in ME but the world.
Jack is wondering what Quran this man has been reading? Must be a different one that jack has read many times. This man wants to put it on the Saudis and not the real culprit … Islam.
“I’m not sure we can publish this book without the Right using it to their ends,” Sarah Durand, a senior editor at Atria Books, a division of Simon & Schuster, wrote in an email to one of the soldiers’ agents.
Jack thinks they are crazy for not publishing this book but they (Simon & Schuster) have a larger calling you see, to protect our dear president.
Fine. Someone WILL publish this book and it will sell. It will give eyewitness accounts not make believe that Simon & Schuster would demand probably at the request of our dear most transparent president.
Obama’s argument is those that have insurance have to pick up the tab for people that don’t have insurance. His ACA will have all tax payers pick up the tab for insurance. Problem is most that don’t have insurance DON’T pay any taxes anyway. So they get a free ride either way. Point is the lying bastard lied and he keeps on lying time after time. How can the american public believe a word this man says much less our allies!
All but one of the fake applicants ended up getting subsidized coverage — and have kept it. In one instance, an application was denied but then approved on a second try. In six other attempts to sign up fake applicants via in-person assisters, just one assister accurately told an investigator that the applicant’s income was too high for a subsidy.
The reasoning for this ruling was simple: That’s what the law says. The section dealing with the creation of state exchanges and the provision of subsidies states, quite clearly, that subsidies are only available in exchanges “established by a State,” which the law expressly defines as the 50 states plus the District of Columbia.
You can bet your ass this one is going to evolve into … that’s not what we meant when we specifically stated that’s what it meant! Because this will bring the whole thing crumbling down.
Have any of you seen the “House of Cards?” Someone should do one and call it “House of Lies.”
And this. At least 39% of american’s are either idiots or they don’t follow what is going on or they really don’t care. By midterms Jack is hoping it’s even much lower … 7% or so!
DAKAR, Senegal — In a video message apparently made by the leader of Nigeria’s Islamist group Boko Haram, Abubakar Shekau claimed responsibility for the kidnapping of hundreds of schoolgirls nearly three weeks ago, called the girls slaves and threatened to “sell them in the market, by Allah.”
“Western education should end,” Mr. Shekau said in the 57-minute video, speaking in Hausa and Arabic. “Girls, you should go and get married.” The Islamist leader also warned that he would “give their hands in marriage because they are our slaves. We would marry them out at the age of nine. We would marry them out at the age of 12,” he said.
Now most muslims will tell you this is NOT Islam. Sorry but this is straight up Islamic war doctrine. All captives in Islamic wars are officially slaves. They can be sold, ransomed, set free or whatever. Once they are captured they are the “property” of the captor. Now in Mohammads time he got 20% of these slaves and even married one of them.
Read the Quran, hadith etc. and you will see what Jack says is the truth. If you don’t want to read Quran, hadith etc to find out the truth … be ignorant. Abubakar Shekau is definitely not ignorant of Islamic war doctrine … you shouldn’t be either.